Pros | Cons |
Whole language encourages teachers to find reading material that reflects a student’s language and culture (Curtis,n.d., para. 5). | There is a lack of structure in lessons and activities (Reyner, 2008, para. 8). |
Whole language helps provide a better understanding of the text (Curtis, n.d., para. 5). | There is a heavy burden on teachers to develop their own curriculum (Reyner, 2008, para. 8). |
Whole language provides a more interesting and creative approach to reading (Curtis, n.d., para. 5). | Learning may come at the expense of accuracy and correctness because students are guessing when they don’t know a word (Curtis, n.d., para. 5). |
Reading Wars: Phonics v. Whole Language
Whole Language v. Phonics
No comments:
Post a Comment